An editorial on the Dallas news, Despite
court ruling, Texas should redouble clean energy policies, argues that
Texas voting against “Clean Power Plan” isn’t the right choice. They write, towards those who are informative about
the CPP, that they show that they are supportive about the plan and adds within the
article, “We hope the future
generations won’t look at the missed opportunity…” to emphasize the reasoning.
The article first provides background
information from a national standpoint first as this plan was/is to be a “U.S.
signature stand point” to even to treaty this with China and India. But now if
U.S. doesn’t comply with their end of the bargain they are out. But the U.S. Supreme Court voted against
“Clean Power plan” which sets back the efforts to reduce carbon emissions.
How does this relate to Texas?
Texas Attorney Gen. Paxton states that this
issue has nothing to do with Texas.
Apparently Texas was a “huge plaintiff” in halted the plan making it a
win for state officials. As to argue against this, the editor tries to
persuade the reader on what Texas should do instead of being part of the
problem.
Which is a simple statement, “Actively leveraging its impressive clean
energy opportunities”
Because as a huge threatening effect to Texans,
as natural gas increases from the factories that pollute the air, with suffer
from illnesses and death.
Then concludes with PROS about supporting
cleaning carbon emissions. Which I see is some convincing evidence that
supports his claim why to support by those who are active readers. BUT to
convince someone with a political stand point I believe the use of numbers
would help too.
A/N: Here’s a link to also help you
understand about the Climate Power Plan.
No comments:
Post a Comment